🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.