🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to prohibit social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". Legislation may be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to approve a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," said a leading MEP behind the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, interest built behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who took her own life after viewing harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," said a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly happening at the regional level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a law capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to follow this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize user protection.

Even as this global discussion evolves, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries indicate that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to make changes on their own.